Appendix A—Invitation to Reviewers

The authors, editors, and staff of the Faculty Guidebook project are committed to refining and evolving the material presented in the current edition of the Faculty Guidebook to better meet the needs of classroom practitioners. The forms in this section are designed to give you a convenient forum for providing feedback. Your completed form will be automatically e-mailed to Steven Beyerlein at sbeyer@uidaho.edu. Thank you for your willingness to help us make the Faculty Guidebook a more valuable resource for faculty in higher education.
 
Module Assessment Form Module Evaluation Form

 

Module Title:    
Reviewed by: Date:

  1. How well are outcomes cited in the overview paragraph at the beginning of the module aligned with the rest of the module? Which outcomes are most thoroughly addressed? Which outcomes need further development? What improvements can you suggest?

     

  2. How well do the flow and content of each sub-section in the module support comprehension? What additions or deletions should be considered?

     

  3. How clear is the writing? What jargon did you find? What stylistic changes would improve readability?

     
  4. Are there any unreferenced or incorrectly referenced statements? What sources do you recommend?

     
  5. Can the module and its links to other modules stand alone? What supplemental discussion is needed?

     


 

 
Module Title:
Reviewed by: Date:
 

Scoring Rubric:
1 2 3 4 5
minimally or not present essence present but below criteria good, meets basic criteria solid, clearly meets criteria very strong, exceeds all expectations
 

Content

 Raw Score (1-5) multiply
by		 Weight Score

Overview

Clear/concise presentation

Sets the stage, gives framework/outcomes

Avoids jargon and technical vocabulary

×

 1

Learning Outcomes

Appropriately scoped and addressed

Inventoried the overview statement

Effectively met without distracting tangents

 × 3

Message Development

Usable by intended audience

Supported with theory

Applicable and valuable to multiple disciplines

 × 2

Validity of Content

Accuracy of the analysis/discussion

Use of supporting evidence

Consistency with other modules

 × 3

Concluding Thoughts

Brings closure efficiently

Suggests next steps for reader

Tone is uplifting and supportive

 × 1

References

Key statements are supported by references

Connects with respected citations in literature

Helpful links to other modules

 × 2

Style

 Raw Score (1-5) multiply by Weight Score

Clarity in Writing

Word usage

Sentence structure

Paragraph structure

 × 2

Organization

Builds on itself

Logically ordered and appropriately labeled

Stays at same depth level

 × 2

Graphics/Formatting

Supported by text

Adds significant value

Aesthetically presented

 × 2

Terminology

Aligned with educational literature on the subject

Terms with special meaning defined in glossary

Consistent with other modules

 × 2

Total Score